Solstice, Light and Dark: Graham Kos Speaks About The Evolution and Corrosion Of The Solstice Vision - Part 1
Monday, December 21, 2009 at 01:00AM This is Part I of a series of interviews with Graham Kos regarding his role with the Destination Club previously known as the Solstice Collection. - Ed
It has been over a year since Graham Kos has spoken to any member of the media as to the fate to The Solstice Collection, the highest end of all Destination Clubs. Here are some questions I posed to him, with answers that may shed some light on what happened from December 2008 to December 2009. - Susan Kime
Remind our readers about what the Solstice Collection was, and what it meant to you and to the members at first.
Our model was small to begin with – our original plan at the outset was to have 7 exceptional homes and 42 members. I originally found the destination club industry compelling as, for the first time, it presented a real estate investment model that allowed you to purchase a category of real estate ( high end second homes ) which historically had the greatest appreciation over time but typically was not acquired for strictly investment purposes. In addition, it was a uniquely fun and creative project that took you to the most beautiful locations in the world.
In the beginning, I had an extremely small but very effective team. I did not hire my first "employee" for the company until year three. I did not take a salary for myself the first two years nor did the company have an office during this time. We were able to accomplish quite a bit with a very small budget. Our secret weapon was my wife, Shay, who did all the design work for Solstice. It was her style, her vision, her way of living that we were selling.
We had great PR, and we received many awards – Best of the Best for three years from Robb [Report], and two years from Business Britain. We raised our rates to the highest in the industry, we bought more properties, our credit lines were solid, and things were going well.
To us, Solstice was more than just a business venture – it was a vision; a way of seeing and indeed a way of being. It also fulfilled a need that I saw consistently with those who I knew were on the UHNW [Ultra High Net Worth] level: to travel in the most elite, seamless manner possible – and not with a lot of extra services by the way! We wanted members to have a real second home experience and with homes that had soul, a story, reflected by great interiors. Where other clubs had a very generic approach to interior design, we had furniture from the best European design houses, original art and sculpture, all hand picked from French flea markets in Paris and Lyon, or made specifically for us. Each item reflected the Solstice vision. We had a Villa in Florence whose façade was created by Michelangelo, a residence deep in the Amazon rain forest, a home in Aspen, designed by a famous young architect, Scott Lindenau, and our newest property, the home in Napa, that took about four years to build, as each stone had to be removed from an old Pony Express office in Texas, and brought here to [the] Napa Valley. I co-architected the home, and Shay did the interiors.
One of the greatest challenges along the way was balancing sales and profitability with the original vision of quality and uniqueness - these two concepts are often at odds in a business proposition and balancing these two somewhat conflicted concepts was one of the underlying issues of contention with the Parallel Group.
How did the merging and de-merging with Parallel affect the structural integrity of the Solstice collection?
We had very high hopes at the time of the Parallel merger. At the time they were a new high end destination club competitor, and we thought that merging would give our members and their members more access and variety of high-end homes. We thought also economically it made sense, but in the end, their focus – making Solstice into a much larger club – and ours, doing so without sacrifice to the quality and uniqueness – just did not jell. We also believed that with the merger additional monies would be invested to expand the portfolio and subsequently that did not happen. So, with the help of a Swiss investor who provided the money to de-merge, we de-merged. This was a necessary step, but it began a process where the de-merge circumstances began to control us, we did not control them.
After the de-merge in May of 2008, ironically, other things became clear but also painful. We took back management of the club in June and then spent the first 90 days closing our Scottsdale office and dramatically downsizing management. A month later Lehman went bankrupt and our phones literally stopped ringing. Our business model was not fundamentally different than others in the industry and it required a certain amount of sales to support the development side of the business. The combination of an abrupt end to sales, and mounting membership redemptions caused great stress to the model. As difficult as these issues were to deal with an even more daunting issue was our main credit facility – the Fortress debt – was coming due at year‘s end, and our lender, like many others at that time, was calling every loan they could (our interest rate had no floor and was yielding just 3.5% - not a terribly attractive yield to a hedge fund). The environment for new lending was extremely difficult at the time.
How did the decline begin, and when did Solstice declare bankruptcy?
2008 was a difficult year as for many reasons, potential members just weren't committing to Solstice, even though many loved the idea. In the beginning of the year our unwinding from parallel seemed to distract from our core sales efforts. We remained optimistic that once past this distraction things would return to normal - they did not. I was asked by certain members of the advisory board to step down in November of 2008. I agreed to do this, despite my misgivings, on the condition that they provide me with a viable plan to retire or replace our existing credit facility coming due at year end. After all I was personally liable on the debt. I actually never received an official response to that proposition as a few days later, after employees left the office one by one , I was informed by a third party in my now empty office that I had been removed by the board. In March of the following year Solstice declared bankruptcy.»
Could you explain the relevance of the Fortress debt and how that impacted - both positively and negatively - the fate of Solstice?
Fortress is a hedge fund and manages private investments. They provided a $50M credit line for Solstice in the summer of 2006. We were allowed to draw 40% of the cost of homes, furnishings and closing costs with that credit line.
At the time we placed the debt Fortress was a new player to the space. Prior to our securing this debt only Textron and Capital Source were lending in this area. From the outside looking in I am sure that this financing would appear to be simple but the reality was that you were purchasing and lending in many different countries - all with different laws regarding lender and borrower rights. At the time we secured this financing it provided the lowest cost and greatest flexibility of any facility that I was aware of in the destination club market, including all the largest clubs. But then again, the Fortress debt was one that our Member Advisory board eventually had issues with: they suggested it was a mistake to fund long-term assets with short-term debt. Like we didn’t know this? The reality was this completely ignores the fact that no long term debt was available in the marketplace at that time (after all, this was a new and unproven industry). Another suggestion I have heard put forth is we took out the line of credit knowing we could never pay it back. That is so ludicrous – I don’t even want to discuss it.
I tend to focus on the bottom line and as it relates to financing the bottom line is no new third party financing was ever put together by the new management last year save the club. I believe now, as I did then, that it was extremely reckless to take control of the club with no plan in place and no past experience to fully understand the all the challenges the club faced.
Part II will be Published Soon.. -Ed
destination_clubs,
fraxfinder,
napa,
solstice 
It is no wonder Luca is proud. Even in this capricious economic climate, the Vallarta Garden’s launch in mid December 2009 has created major buzz. Its location is on Banderas Bay, a peaceful body of water that spans about 40 miles, and is protected by the Sierra Madre mountains. This area is known as the Nayarit Riviera, located on the Pacific, non-Hurricane side of Mexico, midway between Puerto Vallarta and Punta Mita, near a picturesque town of La Cruz de Huanacaxtle.
Calistoga Ranch architect Scott Lee knew that Calistoga Ranch needed to reflect a well-defined, natural organicity. “Our charge was to create a private retreat, a sanctuary celebrating what Napa Valley is all about - food, wine and nature. We designed and individually placed each of the more than 200 structures on the site not only to avoid cutting down the 100-year-old heritage oak trees but also to integrate them into our design.”
The undeniable feeling is that of living in an elite treehouse, with all the spa and dining amenities of living at a large resort, defining the best of both worlds, nature and culture, sanctuary and society, peace and - if you choose - activity.
ViaMari may easily be called a theme-based